Another proof of ignorance shared by Aerial of torch.

[Sa Deuteronomio 6:4, ay sinabi ni Mosies sa mga Israelita na:
“Dinggin mo, O Israel: Ang PANGINOON nating Dios ay iisang PANGINOON!” (NPV).]

However, Moses never taught the people about God being a one individual God. 
it won't conform to other passages he wrote to support Manalo's theory. 

Let's read this Genesis 1.26:

Genesis 1:26 New International Version (NIV)
Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness,..

The Hebrew translation of god is Elohim, a collective noun for Eloah.
therefore Eloah is singular. 

it's easy to understand that not all singular verbs are for singular nouns usage.

in the case of Elohim, it is a collective noun which also act like a singular noun.
now if Eloah denotes singularity that supported a one individual God then it raised a question alone, Why didn't Moses use it in Gen 1:26 for Manalo's sake?

the answer is it will not conform to the remaining elements embedded such as the use of "us" & "our" to describe the number of person speaking. 

Elohim can be broken down as Eloah, Eloah,......and so on. 

Our proof from my previous post that the God in Genesis was composed of a Father and a Mother can be a help in solving Gen 1:26.

Let's rewrite again Gen 1:26 with regards to Gen 2:24:

Genesis 1:26 New International Version
Then the Father said to the Mother, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness,..

it's clear that the passage has finally spoken by itself that God is not a kind of individual God as Manalo wanted to believe, but a married God who stood as our first parents. 

Again if God is only a one individual God then how did he accept this fact when he shared his holiness to Moses as he was about to confront Pharaoh? 

Exodus 7:1
Then the LORD said to Moses, “See, I have made you like God to Pharaoh, and your brother Aaron will be your prophet.

Is God trying to make idols out of Moses? 

>>>>>>>>>Oneness of God?<<<<<<<<<<<<<

i'd been reading the bible and there's no proof that God is just only a one individual person. 
however, oneness in terms of biblical sense doesn't necessarily mean only one cited this fact in Gen 2:24 and John 10:30. 

Genesis 2:24 New International Version (NIV)
24 That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh.

Covenant made the two in one flesh. in the case of God since Adam has a Father and a Mother it would be nice to say that his parents bound as one. 
therefore the God in Genesis account is one married God. 

we can't discount or reject the acceptance that the man mentioned was not Adam. 
this is a pure ignorance on the critics part. 

Adam became a model for all humanities. if the passage which served as a lesson intended for the rest of his sons after him then it would be an unfair treatment for Adam since all humanities committed the same sins that started from the first man. 

Another passage debunking the one individual God can be found in John 10:30 as we read: 

John 10:30 New International Version (NIV)
I and the Father are one.

the context stands alone that the two personage was in reference to the Genesis 2:24 account. Jesus was just merely speaking of his previous status as one in the Genesis times